Steam Locomotive smoke
#11
Posted 21 February 2024 - 09:11 PM
Since the caboose smoke emitters emit particles at a fixed rate, you can see how wide the particles appear to be spaced at higher speeds. It looks OK when the caboose is at a standstill and/or moving slow.
#12
Posted 22 February 2024 - 09:21 AM
I just thought, the effects() section's sample would be sufficient for me to study.
Now, I can compare and debug my experimental eng-file! Great.
Quote
But what does that comment mean, while all z-coordinates are the same - 6.261
Quote
hah, instead of being stretched thinner with speed - the smoke looks stratched between single "clowds", which are bigger in size, than expected...
#13
Posted 22 February 2024 - 11:26 AM
Weter, on 22 February 2024 - 09:21 AM, said:
That comment is irrelevant for the Milwaukee 261, It applies only to the PRR T1.
Weter, on 22 February 2024 - 11:34 AM, said:
Yes. Here's an image to prove it:
RED = Exhaust from front cylinders.
GREEN = Exhaust from rear cylinders.
BLUE = Exhaust from booster.
#14
Posted 22 February 2024 - 11:50 AM
Very interesting to look at drawings. Outstanding machine, indeed.
Big Boy had 4, some British "aristocracy" - too.
Here was 2-chimney variant, tied with Pirin's superheater usage.
Cross-sections show us, how prolifered the boiler was.
#15
Posted 22 February 2024 - 01:07 PM
Weter, on 22 February 2024 - 11:50 AM, said:
Very interesting to look at drawings. Outstanding machine, indeed.
Big Boy had 4, some British "aristocracy" - too.
Here was 2-chimney variant, tied with Pirin's superheater usage.
Cross-sections show us, how prolifered the boiler was.
Nope Big Boy had two! Same set up as the PRR T1
#16
Posted 23 February 2024 - 04:49 PM
Take a look at the PRR S2 turbo . It's got 4 .
Rod
#17
Posted 24 February 2024 - 12:36 AM
Really thanks: I was pretty sure, I did see 4 stacks on some very big locomotive.
Now I know, which was that.
#18
Posted 24 February 2024 - 03:33 AM
#19
Posted 24 February 2024 - 03:58 AM
#20
Posted 24 February 2024 - 12:46 PM