Elvas Tower: Going beyond the 4 GB of memory - Elvas Tower

Jump to content

  • 32 Pages +
  • « First
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Going beyond the 4 GB of memory Rate Topic: -----

#241 User is offline   Smecty 

  • Hostler
  • Group: Status: Active Member
  • Posts: 54
  • Joined: 31-December 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellesley, Mass., USA
  • Country:

Posted 04 June 2018 - 07:02 AM

Hello Carlo,


I think there are still some freightanim problems with the 4142 version of ORMG; see screenshots below.

In ORMG42:

Attached Image: ORMG4142_1.jpg
Attached Image: ORMG4142_2.jpg

In ORX-4142

Attached Image: ORMG4142_3.jpg
Attached Image: ORMG4142_4.jpg

I've also attached a zip file with the log files for both sessions.

David
Attached File  ORMG42.zip (229.64K)
Number of downloads: 297

#242 User is offline   espee 

  • Engineer
  • Group: Status: Active Member
  • Posts: 553
  • Joined: 09-January 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bridgetown, Western Australia
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 04 June 2018 - 07:16 AM

Are these static or animated FreightAnims that you are having problems with ?

#243 User is offline   Smecty 

  • Hostler
  • Group: Status: Active Member
  • Posts: 54
  • Joined: 31-December 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellesley, Mass., USA
  • Country:

Posted 04 June 2018 - 07:58 AM

Hello Richard,

They are static: the trailers you see on the flatcars between the autoracks and the empties at the rear.

David

#244 User is offline   espee 

  • Engineer
  • Group: Status: Active Member
  • Posts: 553
  • Joined: 09-January 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bridgetown, Western Australia
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 04 June 2018 - 06:51 PM

Quote

Hello Richard,

They are static: the trailers you see on the flatcars between the autoracks and the empties at the rear.

David


David,

Are you using the MSTS or OR code for your FA's - I don't have any problems using the OR code all FA's are displaying properly.

#245 User is offline   Csantucci 

  • Member, Board of Directors
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 7,008
  • Joined: 31-December 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:

Posted 04 June 2018 - 11:28 PM

Smecty,
looking at the build number, I suspect you aren't using the build available here http://www.elvastowe...post__p__237323 , but the preceding one referring to x.4141. Re-download the correct version and retry.
In the log you should have this line
Build      = 0.0.6726.32737 (2018-06-01 18:11:14Z)


#246 User is offline   Smecty 

  • Hostler
  • Group: Status: Active Member
  • Posts: 54
  • Joined: 31-December 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellesley, Mass., USA
  • Country:

Posted 05 June 2018 - 03:45 PM

Hello Carlo,

It was as you suspected; I downloaded the version at the link you provided and all was well with the freightanims.

Many thanks, and thank you for your support of OR!

David

#247 User is offline   Hamza97 

  • Engineer
  • Group: Status: Contributing Member
  • Posts: 606
  • Joined: 01-March 15
  • Gender:Male
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 05 June 2018 - 10:09 PM

I downloaded the mono game version of Open Rails, It works perfectly for me with only exception that
display resolution is stuck at 1280*720, no matter what I select in Video resolution option in Open Rails options menu. Mine native resolution is 1366*768.. :wtf01:

#248 User is offline   Csantucci 

  • Member, Board of Directors
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 7,008
  • Joined: 31-December 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:

Posted 05 June 2018 - 11:43 PM

I don't have this problem. Do you have it in windowed mode or in full screen mode?

#249 User is offline   Hamza97 

  • Engineer
  • Group: Status: Contributing Member
  • Posts: 606
  • Joined: 01-March 15
  • Gender:Male
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 06 June 2018 - 10:35 PM

Hello...,,

I have this problem in full screen mode, not tested in windowed mode.. :sweatingbullets:

#250 User is offline   jtr1962 

  • Fireman
  • Group: Status: Active Member
  • Posts: 178
  • Joined: 13-December 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:

Posted 12 June 2018 - 06:38 PM

Just tried the 4142 version of ORMG. Good news is greatly improved frame rates (~60 versus high 30s to low 40s) compared to regular OR. Bad news is my global setting for antialiasing (which overrides the application settings) don't seem to work with the MG version of OR, although it works just fine with regular OR. That means things like wires are somewhat jagged. I can enable multisampling in the OR video options and it looks great BUT this tanks my frame rates to the high teens. Might it be possible to have another option to select the degree of multisampling (i.e. 2x, 4x, 8x, 16x, 32x)? This might let the end user select the best compromise between appearance and performance.

  • 32 Pages +
  • « First
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users