BrakePipe charging and discharging. 395-style
#1
Posted 08 June 2020 - 08:06 PM
https://техучеба.рф/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Кран-машиниста-395.jpg
Note the sector in the next picture to see, wich position is notched, wich-no.
http://rcit.su/gif/tiM0-10.gif
First, at I handle position, the BP is connected to the MR directly, so its recharging goes rather fast and BP gains high pressure.
As a result-fast recharging of long freight trains and guaranteed release of triple valves in each wagon (as some of them may be hardly released)
Second, at II handle position, feeding of the BP is made through the reductor, which releases excessive air till the pre-setted by the engineer pressure is achived, then, as leakage from BP continues, the reductor compensates that losses (is it equal to "Running" state?)
It's possible to perform "normal" brake release by II position, BUT MSTS (ORTS?) can't release brakes such way (or I don't know, how?)
The dream is to have special control, simulating reductor adjusting (say, +- 0,8 bar around 6), but it's not so principial, at last.
Third:
III,IV,V and VI positions can be modelled rather good (they looking much like Lap, Hold, Service and Emergency, resp.)
But there's V-A and it can mean either:
-very slow discharging of BP, for prevent stressing of couplers in case of very long freight trains (the "Soft tempo")
and I don't see, if the "MinimalReductionStart" is adequate substitute for this (again, maybe I'm not clever enough);
-or, in case of passenger modification, the V-Э is the NOTCH, where Hold status remaining, but EP signal is issued to train, so wagons apply their brakes without BP discharge.
I see, it's not possible to combine EP and Auto brakes in one consist yet (am I right?), furthermore, when I use "EP Apply", I observe a pressure drop in BP, so it's not good.
So, What and how EP(ECP) brake controller model in ORTS can do at this time?
#2
Posted 25 October 2020 - 01:37 PM
As well, the illustration of the 483 triple valve, working with them.
Translations:
Valve 394
Air distributor 483
#3
Posted 26 October 2020 - 04:26 AM
The answer is no it can not be done in OR at the moment.
The answer applies not just to those specific controllers, but to very many air brake controllers old and new.
Two things that will need to change in the model to allow this:
1. Overcharging needs to be allowed. At present the system can never exceed the value of TrainBrakesControllerMaxSystemPressure - so an overcharge value would need to be added. Then as you say we would need to ensure that the reservoir pipe was gradually returned to normal working pressure when the brake handle is returned to the "RUNNING" position.
2. For twin pipe systems different values need to be allowed for the main reservoir pressure and the reservoir pipe pressure - at present both are determined by AirBrakesMainMaxAirPressure
Another note is that OR brake token names do not correspond to the common positions on many brake handles.
In OR TrainBrakesControllerRunningStart has only the effect of a HOLD or LAP position - it does not restore the brake pipe to normal pressure after a reduction.
In general I have used TrainBrakesControllerFullQuickReleaseStart for the RELEASE position on brake controllers (although it does not do overcharge) and TrainBrakesControllerReleaseStart for the RUNNING position as it will maintain train pipe against leakage and slowly return TP to normal pressure after a reduction.
Three main types of controllers used for air brakes in UK were as follows.
1. For older electric trains and steam trains using Westinghouse brakes - air single pipe system
Brake_Train ( 0 1 0.01 0.50 NumNotches ( 5 Notch( 0.0 0 TrainBrakesControllerFullQuickReleaseStart ) Comment ( RELEASE - connects brake pipe to main reservoir ) Notch( 0.25 0 TrainBrakesControllerReleaseStart ) Comment ( RUNNING ) Notch( 0.50 0 TrainBrakesControllerHoldStart ) Comment ( LAP ) Notch( 0.75 0 TrainBrakesControllerFullServiceStart ) Comment ( APPLY ) Notch( 1.0 0 TrainBrakesControllerEmergencyStart ) ) )
These did not have graduated release - so it would be good if this could be put in the eng file rather than on the options tab.
2. As used here on diesel and electric locos in 1960s and 1970s with twin pipe system (with graduated release!)
Brake_Train ( 0 1 0.1 0.2 NumNotches ( 4 Notch ( 0.0 0 TrainBrakesControllerFullQuickReleaseStart ) Comment ( RELEASE - sprung position - overcharges train pipe ) Notch ( 0.1 0 TrainBrakesControllerReleaseStart ) Comment ( RUNNING ) Notch ( 0.2 1 TrainBrakesControllerContinuousServiceStart ) Notch ( 1.0 0 TrainBrakesControllerEmergencyStart ))) Comment ( add ANTI SLIP brake ) Brake_Engine ( 0 1 0.1 0.0 NumNotches( 1 Notch( 0 1 EngineBrakesControllerContinuousServiceStart ) ) )
3. A modern stepped brake
Brake_Train ( 0 1.0 0.01 0.2 NumNotches ( 9 Notch ( 0 0 TrainBrakesControllerFullQuickReleaseStart ) Comment ( RELEASE ) Notch ( 0.01 0 TrainBrakesControllerReleaseStart ) Comment ( RUNNING ) Notch ( 0.02 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Notch ( 0.16 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Notch ( 0.40 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Notch ( 0.65 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Notch ( 0.80 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Notch ( 0.99 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Notch ( 1.00 0 TrainBrakesControllerEmergencyStart ))) Comment ( RELEASE has separate overcharge button ) Brake_Engine ( 0 1 0.3 0 NumNotches ( 3 Notch ( 0 0 EngineBrakesControllerReleaseStart ) Notch ( 0.3 0 EngineBrakesControllerHoldStart ) Notch ( 0.6 0 EngineBrakesControllerFullServiceStart )))
Although the brake token says 'EP' this will also give you a regular air brake with steps.
#4
Posted 26 October 2020 - 08:27 AM
The first question, wich I want to ask you is why do you calling the brake pipe as
Quote
I was confused a little and at first time, I thought, you was mistaken, but it was repeated further.
I suppose, there are 3 pipes:
- the brake pipe(wich causes automatic brake application in case of pressure drop in it) marked RED;
- the feeding, or the MAIN RESERVOIRE ( as it called at *.eng-file's statements) pipe, marked BLUE;
- and sometimes, the independent brakes pipe, wich connects MUed locos to synchronize their loco brake applications marked YELLOW
#5
Posted 26 October 2020 - 09:10 AM
Older electric multiple units with Westinghouse also had a second pipe running the length of the train. The second pipe connected together the reservoirs on all of the motor coaches. This was not a "reservoir" pipe in the sense of the two pipe system, I was really just a way to make a larger air reservoir by joining together all the main reservoirs to create one large reservoir. The brake system on these electric multiple units was still a single pipe system like the one in the diagram as the auxiliary reservoirs are charged from the train pipe.
A twin pipe air brake system has both a main pipe and a reservoir pipe running the length of the train:http://www.railway-technical.com/_Media/two-pipe-air-brake-pic_med.png
This provides for a faster release of the brakes by charging the auxiliary reservoirs from the "reservoir pipe" rather than from the train pipe. (Twin pipe vacuum brakes work in a similar way.)
Until recently EP brakes worked in a similar way to twin pipe air brakes as they had both a reservoir pipe and a train pipe running the length of the train. In addition they had electric cables that could then provide for both fast release and fast application.http://www.railway-technical.com/_Media/whse-ep-brake-elec-pic_med.png
More modern EP brakes have replaced the train pipe with an electric cable so that now the reservoir pipe provides for all the air requirements.
http://www.railway-technical.com/_Media/brake-system-architecture_m_med.png
The diagrams are from the Railway Technical website which has more detail on different types of train brakes.
In UK at present locomotive hauled passenger trains, "freightliner" trains and most "high speed trains" use a twin pipe air brake system; freight trains use a single pipe air brake system and most multiple unit trains have EP brakes.
As a bit of history the USSR at one time developed a twin pipe system for freight trains.
#6
Posted 26 October 2020 - 09:13 AM
In the above diagrams - train pipe is red and reservoir pipe is blue - but on real trains the angle cocks and hose connections are red for train pipe and yellow for reservoir pipe.
The MU air connections between locomotives generally seem to have white connectors and angle cocks.
#7
Posted 26 October 2020 - 11:16 AM
Lets see the shunter's pneumatic brake diagram:
https://myswitcher.ru/tomt/tomt_1.html
And a freight car's system-single piped:
https://myswitcher.ru/tomt/tomt_6.html
Quote
So what if we raise the SYSTEM MAXIMAL PRESSURE's value to, say 7 or 8 kgf/cm2 and let it never be exceeded as is, but then we will see the missing of the NOMINAL BRAKE SYSTEM PRESSURE statement, wich is 5,1-6,8kgf/cm2 usually.
And, I repeat, this last value is adjustable IRL for tune-up the brake system capabilities according to the particular operation mode(freight, passenger, flat terrain or hilly)
Also, the RESERVOIR PIPE pressure is equalized with main reservoirs and never be lower-that is its NORMAL working pressure.
This way, the given thesis is true in case of single-piped system:
Quote
Quote
I agree, but I think, that was from MSTS...
So why do ORTS maintain this incorrect behavior at RUNNING position?
Quote
So do I. But can you say, are there adjustable values for quick and normal release rates?
Please, clear for me:
1.What distinction is between "Full Service" and "Continious Service" in ORTS?
2. Is it right , that "EP Apply" notes the handle's position value (digits) similar as "dummy" does?
I had assigned "EP Apply" at 0,4 of the handle's way and it applies about half of max pressure to BC
I tried to model VA position (see 1st post) and pasted EPApplyStart at 0,4 of handle's full span, so...
#8
Posted 26 October 2020 - 11:51 AM
Single pipe brake system with a main reservoir pipe. It connects all Main reservoirs and supplies OTHER pneumatic equipment (doors, sanders etc.) with air.
EP mode is default, but the Brake Cylinders is filled by the BrakePipe directly, wich is feed as at Hold position.
http://scbist.com/scb/uploaded/1_1386393089.jpg
#9
Posted 26 October 2020 - 01:18 PM
Quote
TrainBrakesControllerMaxQuickReleaseRate
and
TrainBrakesControllerMaxReleaseRate
should allow for different values.
Quote
Full Service - is for older non-self lapping brakes - the brake pipe pressure will continue to drop if the handle is left in this position - to hold an application you must move back to the hold or lap position.
This type of controller needs to have both TrainBrakesControllerHoldStart and TrainBrakesControllerFullServiceStart
Continuous Service is for more modern self lapping brakes - move the handle to any position between 'Running' and 'Full Service' and the brakes will gave a proportionate application - no lap or hold position needed.
Quote
I had assigned "EP Apply" at 0,4 of the handle's way and it applies about half of max pressure to BC.
It is not exactly the same as dummy. The EP brake handle positions depend on the values used for TrainBrakesControllerFullServicePressureDrop and TrainBrakesControllerMinPressureReduction. You may need to adjust those to get the steps you need.
So in my example if I use
TrainBrakesControllerFullServicePressureDrop( 24 ) TrainBrakesControllerMinPressureReduction( 6 )
Then I should get the following brake pipe pressures -
Brake_Train ( 0 1.0 0.01 0.2 NumNotches ( 9 Notch ( 0 0 TrainBrakesControllerFullQuickReleaseStart ) Comment ( RELS = Overcharges ATP to 5.40 bar ) Notch ( 0.01 0 TrainBrakesControllerReleaseStart ) Comment ( RUN = 5.00 bar ) Notch ( 0.02 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Comment ( INIL 1 = 4.60 bar ) Notch ( 0.16 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Comment ( 2 = 4.35 bar ) Notch ( 0.40 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Comment ( 3 = 4.10 bar ) Notch ( 0.65 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Comment ( 4 = 3.85 bar ) Notch ( 0.80 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Comment ( 5 = 3.60 bar ) Notch ( 0.99 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Comment ( FULL SERV 6 = 3.35 bar ) Notch ( 1.00 0 TrainBrakesControllerEmergencyStart ) Comment ( EMGCY )))
It works near enough for everything except the 5.40 bar!
#10
Posted 26 October 2020 - 10:47 PM
Quote
This should be possible depending on the values you choose for TrainBrakesControllerMinPressureReduction and Notch ( x 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart )
Quote
Good point. For a train that has an EP system the train pipe pressure should not drop in normal operation.
This should not depend on the EPApply token though. That brake token can be used for single pipe and twin pipe air brakes to give a notched brake.
What we should have is something like this -
For BrakesTrainBrakeType( "Air_twin_pipe" ) or BrakesTrainBrakeType( "Air_single_pipe" ) the train pipe pressure should drop.
For BrakesTrainBrakeType( "EP" ) there should be no drop in train pipe pressure when the brake is applied. (This applies to both old type with a real train pipe and the modern version with a virtual train pipe.)
(I do not know how ECP brakes work either in real life or in OR - as far as I know they, like emergency reservoirs, are something found on North American freight trains.)
I have made three types of EP brake controller. This is a very early EP controller from the 1920s:
Brake_Train ( 0 1 0.05 0.1 NumNotches ( 6 Notch ( 0 0 TrainBrakesControllerReleaseStart ) Notch ( 0.1 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPHoldStart ) Notch ( 0.2 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPFullServiceStart ) Notch ( 0.7 0 TrainBrakesControllerHoldStart ) Notch ( 0.8 0 TrainBrakesControllerFullServiceStart ) Notch ( 0.9 0 TrainBrakesControllerEmergencyStart )))
The first notches are EP braking only and should not reduce the train pipe pressure - the later notches are ordinary Westinghouse air brake and should work like the older non - self lapping brakes without graduated release.
From the 1930s to the 1980s EP controllers in UK were self lapping like this
Brake_Train ( 0 1 0.05 0.15 NumNotches ( 5 Notch ( 0.0 0 TrainBrakesControllerReleaseStart ) Notch ( 0.1 1 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Notch ( 0.7 0 TrainBrakesControllerHoldStart ) Notch ( 0.8 0 TrainBrakesControllerFullServiceStart ) Notch ( 0.9 0 TrainBrakesControllerEmergencyStart )))
Again the first part of the controller operates the EP brake and the second part the conventional air brake. In this version the EP brake is self-lapping. As explained in this video the EP brake has graduated release but the conventional air brake does not.As before the pressure in the train pipe should not drop when the EP brake is used, but only drops when the air brake is used.
The more modern EP brakes replace the train pipe with a virtual train pipe - an electric cable - which is either ON - for all normal operation or OFF for emergency such as train divided. These are often combined with throttle and dynamic brake. They may be continuous like this one
Brake_Train ( 0 1 0.1 0.2 NumNotches ( 3 Notch( 0 0 TrainBrakesControllerReleaseStart ) Notch( 0.1 1 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Notch( 1.0 0 TrainBrakesControllerEmergencyStart ) ) )
or notched like this one
Brake_Train ( 0 1 0.01 0.26 NumNotches ( 5 Notch( 0 0 TrainBrakesControllerReleaseStart ) Notch( 0.26 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Notch( 0.55 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Notch( 0.90 0 TrainBrakesControllerEPApplyStart ) Notch( 1.0 0 TrainBrakesControllerEmergencyStart ) ) )
...this last one being used with TrainBrakesControllerMinPressureReduction( 1 ) in order to get the desired positions.
But yes... point well made - IRL the train pipe pressure does not fall when the EP brake is used.
#11
Posted 27 October 2020 - 07:33 AM
Quote
Have never heard about it before.
Well, I made a copy of ER2 EMU train to find experimentaly a proper tokens and settings for right EP function, but BP pressure dropped there.
The only benefits I have (what was looking like real) are fast apply (rising of BC pressure) and graduated release.
There was an artifact too: the pressure in BP jumped sometimes during returning handle to Hold position
When I will be able, I'll show you a code or send files.
You understood me a bit incorrect: when I mentioned "reductor" I meant an ability to adjust BP "normal" or, as here called "releasing state" pressure, wich then maintained at Running position (system max BP pressure - in MSTS terms) as a real 394(5) valve has a separate control, of the BP feeding device, served to adjust it for different train types (passenger 5,1; freight - till 6, and at hilly terrain-till 6,5 bar)
I experimented with brake controller of passenger diesel, as such diesels use EP IRL- I told a little bit about that... The pressure dropped too, looking like self-lapping way.
Quote
So continues service is used after self-lapping notches and works exactly like full service, right? (constantly releasing air from BP till 0 bar) is it only different name to display in HUD?
Is separating by Hold between EP and regular ranges compulsory? (395 doesn't have special notch for it)
#12
Posted 27 October 2020 - 09:51 AM
Quote
No, continuous service is instead of notches it is not the same as full service.
For a brake that is not self-lapping OR Full Quick Release / Release / Hold / Full Service / Emergency = IRL Release / Running / Lap / Apply / Emergency
For a brake that is self-lapping two choices either
OR Full Quick Release / Release /Continous Service / Emergency = IRL Release / Running / Initial>>>>>>>>Full Service / Emergency
or
OR Full Quick Release / Release / EPApply / EPApply / EPApply / Emergency = IRL Release / Running / Notch 1 / Notch 2 / Notch 3 / Emergency
Sorry, my examples may be a bit confusing because the EP brake in the second one is self-lapping (and has graduated release) but the air brake is not self lapping (and does not have graduated release).
The hold is needed in that example for the air brake - if the air brake for your emu is self-lapping then you do not need hold.
Looking at your first two examples (and relying on Google translate)
The 394 controller -
I = Release = FullQuickReleaseII = Running = Release
III and IV - I am a little confused - because the system is fed or not by something being translated as "Surge Tank" ( уравнительном резервуаре ) and I am not sure if that is equivalent to the main reservoir.
It sounds as though both III and IV are variations of Lap or Hold possibly this is what the OR Running token is for and you use Running for III and Hold for IV - just a guess, not sure at all.
V = Apply = FullService
VI = Emergency
#13
Posted 27 October 2020 - 05:28 PM
Quote
That's not really the case though, there's implementations of EP going back quite literally to the 1890s that were merely overlaid on the existing air system, and indeed most implementations until the mid 20th century worked in parallel with the conventional valves, or alternatively were used to perform functions not easily done with a single pipe system such as holding brake cylinder pressure while charging the brake pipe.
That said, for newer implementations like "ECP" where the mechanical valves have been replaced with electronics on each car, there's no longer a need for brake pipe pressure to drop in parallel with a brake command. These systems come across as something like WABCO's various experiments with straight air like SME and SMEE where the conventional brake pipe no longer does much except for emergency functions, but suitable for longer trains.
Open Rails currently has only a basic EP implementation, with no support for the later and nothing at all for fully electric "brake-by-wire" systems like Westcode where there's no (conventional) brake pipe left, just a main reservoir pipe that serves a dual function as air supply and protection.
#14
Posted 27 October 2020 - 11:06 PM
Thanks for the additional information.
Are you able to point me towards some sources of information about the older EP brakes that you mention? Since EP brakes were not extensively used in Europe at that time I was not even aware the existed at such an early date.
In UK the first introduction of the EP brake was the Westinghouse A type which was fitted to London Underground "Standard Stock" and District Line "F stock" in the late 1920s and early 1930s. (Some discussion here.) From the late 1930s the D type (self-lapping) EP brakes were used on all new London Transport stock. Bullied's experimental double decker trains were the first main line EMUs to have EP brakes and from 1950 onwards all new British Rail EMU stock had EP brakes. For both the A type and the D type the brake pipe pressure does not drop when the EP brake is used - only when the air brake is used.
So how to model them in OR? I understand that in general the policy is to code for the common variations of brakes and not to attempt to cater for all possible variations. On that basis there are a huge number of MSTS and OR models of trains from all around the world that have EP brakes where the brake pipe pressure should not drop. So this is definitely something that needs to be looked at.
Are there many models of trains having the older type of EP brakes that you have described? If there are not many it may be a variation to be considered in the more distant future.
There are half a dozen variations of braking systems that I would like to see included in OR - but with only one person AFAIK writing brake code at the moment then most of them are not likely to see the light of day.
Quote
ECP is not really a variation of EP, it is as far as I can see something totally different - although to use your words it is "overlaid on an air brake system" - there is a good description of ECP on the Railway Technical website:
Quote
A new form of electrical control of air braking is currently being tested by a number of railroads in the US. It is known as ECP and uses modern electronic techniques to overcome the problems of air braking on long freight trains.
The pure air control brake system invented by George Westinghouse in the 1860s and still used by almost all freight trains in the US and in many other parts of the world suffers from two main problems. It takes a long time for the air messages to travel along the train and there is no graduated release. For example, the delay for a reduction in train line pressure to travel from the leading locomotive to the rear of a 150 car consist can be 60 seconds. Also, you have to fully release the brake and wait for the supply reservoirs to recharge before you can reapply. Electrical control can overcome these difficulties.
ECP refers to Electronically Controlled Pneumatic brakes, key word being "Electronically" as opposed to "electrically". Older systems fitted to passenger trains (see above), use several train wires to operate individual valves or variations in switching of the wires to control brakes. Most of these systems use a second train line for main reservoir air supplies and they do not have the built-in two-way communications that ECP systems have. A car in an ECP brake train can do a self-diagnosis and report the information to the engineer and it only requires the standard train line pipe.
In summary
EP - electrically controlled - overlaid on twin pipe air brake system (modern versions replacing the the train pipe with an electrical connection) - used on passenger trains - particularly electric multiple units - used all around the world today.
ECP - electronically controlled - overlaid on single pipe air brake system - used on freight trains - particularly long freight trains - used in USA.
#15
Posted 28 October 2020 - 05:38 PM
Quote
The 394 controller -
I = Release = FullQuickReleaseII = Running = Release
III and IV - I am a little confused - because the system is fed or not by something being translated as "Surge Tank" ( уравнительном резервуаре ) and I am not sure if that is equivalent to the main reservoir.
It sounds as though both III and IV are variations of Lap or Hold possibly this is what the OR Running token is for and you use Running for III and Hold for IV - just a guess, not sure at all.
https://m.youtube.co...h?v=desAkvBhNKE
I = Charge is connection the BP to MR directly, so the pressure in BP can raise quickly and approach to MR pressure ( overcharge)
So, instead of FullQuickRelease, this causes overcharge of BP to almost MR pressure or less - depending of time, the handle was holden here before returning to Running.
This is used for quick recharging of BP during train's departure, in downhill or after coupling to a long train or for guaranteed releasing all triple in train, as some of them could freese, stick or fail to release for other reasons.
II = Running, when the pressure in BP is maintained according to the reductor setting, adjusted by the driver; if overcharged, it will decrease by stabilizer, and then the feeding of BP compensates any leaks.
The driver sets this pressure, adjusting the reductor's setting manually. This is for travelling with breakers released or for soft smooth release of brakes. Up to 3-5 minutes is need for completely release all brakes in long train this way.
III= Lap. The leaks in system are decreasing BP pressure slowly, as BP feeding stopped.
This used for test the leak rate of train before departure, the condition of break equipment and for safe breaking before terminal stations, where occasionally release of brakes may occur if use "Hold with feeding" causing collisions.
IV= Hold <that is not "surge tank", that is equalizing reservoir actually :) > so the pressure in BP is maintained to be equal to that ER pressure by feeding BP from MR. Used for test leaks from ER itself.
VA either can be
-"soft application" (freight 394 variant) when discharging performed at minimal rate, so triple walves of all train reacts only to pressure, but not to its drop rate, and this way, the application during all train lenght is more synchronous-this saves couplers of long trains of stress;
-or "EP apply" (passenger 395 variant) BUT in this case the pneumatic system remains like at IV (hold with feeding) position, but electric valves in each car connects BC to BP and AR directly, so them charged with compressed air and BP feeds AR, being supplyed by MR itself. We have single pipe system.
So it works exactly like V- the time of handle holden here determinates the BC pressure, no multiple notches or smooth range! But only one notch.
V=Full service ("full" means rate of discharge, because pressure drop depends of time, the handle was hold here by the driver)
Because the pressure drops quite fast, the triple walves in each car reacts on it and opens their own chanals to atmosphere. So BP discharges at each car and it goes faster, than during "Soft apply" this is regular braking sequence. The longer hold of handle-the higher pressure in BC.
But for driver not to concentrate on waiting for desired pressure reached in all train, he actually watches to ER manometer's needle, then returns handle to Hold and further discharge of BP automatically stops when it reaches pressure of ER.
VI= Emergency. As additional channel opened to discharge BP, the rate is 3-4 times faster, than at V.