Problem with BIN standard rolling stock.
#1
Posted 06 September 2018 - 02:32 PM
Today after update I have spoted something like this. All cars or locos mod to BIN standard(eng.files-lenght parameter , and sd-box parameter) are crushed one to other. Look at screen. This problem occure only with bin standard stock , and almost all polish stock is under BIN standard ;/
https://zapodaj.net/images/487b76c3c3625.png
https://zapodaj.net/images/487b76c3c3625.png
#3
Posted 06 September 2018 - 06:43 PM
Fablok, on 06 September 2018 - 02:32 PM, said:
Today after update I have spoted something like this. All cars or locos mod to BIN standard(eng.files-lenght parameter , and sd-box parameter) are crushed one to other. Look at screen. This problem occure only with bin standard stock , and almost all polish stock is under BIN standard ;/
Can you provide me with selection of the coupler R0 statements out of the stock effected?
Thanks
#5
Posted 07 September 2018 - 04:59 PM
I think that this should now be corrected in #4199.
It appears that the first parameter in the coupler R0 statement is used as a defacto separation distance between the cars. So in the case of this stock, r0 ( 80cm 150cm ), thus there is an 80cm gap introduced between the stock.
Please confirm whether wagons are "back to normal".
It appears that the first parameter in the coupler R0 statement is used as a defacto separation distance between the cars. So in the case of this stock, r0 ( 80cm 150cm ), thus there is an 80cm gap introduced between the stock.
Please confirm whether wagons are "back to normal".
#6
Posted 08 September 2018 - 03:16 AM
Everything back on track again :) Thanks :)
https://zapodaj.net/images/35073654d57ef.png
https://zapodaj.net/images/35073654d57ef.png
#7
Posted 09 September 2018 - 09:55 AM
Freight cars are Ok but there is problem with passengers cars. There are spaces beetwen rubber guards in passanger passage.
https://zapodaj.net/images/63a16e733fa22.png
https://zapodaj.net/images/74a45ba542780.png
https://zapodaj.net/images/63a16e733fa22.png
https://zapodaj.net/images/74a45ba542780.png
#8
Posted 09 September 2018 - 02:16 PM
I have reverted another parameter that was altered try #4201.
This issue is a good example where stock has been poorly defined.
For example the freight wagons have had rigid couplers set ( using CouplingHasRigidConnection (1) ), whereas the passenger cars do not have a similar statement, and hence they should have a flexible coupling which allows some level of slack. The amount of slack typically should be set by the R0 parameter, ie y - x value. In the case of the passenger wagons this slack would have been 150 - 80 = 70cm.
However the current coupler defined in OR code is typically set as a rigid coupler with 1.2cm of slack for all wagons regardless of whether they are rigid couplers or not. Hence the reason why these wagons appeared to "work" ok.
Please advise if this corrects the problem.
This issue is a good example where stock has been poorly defined.
For example the freight wagons have had rigid couplers set ( using CouplingHasRigidConnection (1) ), whereas the passenger cars do not have a similar statement, and hence they should have a flexible coupling which allows some level of slack. The amount of slack typically should be set by the R0 parameter, ie y - x value. In the case of the passenger wagons this slack would have been 150 - 80 = 70cm.
However the current coupler defined in OR code is typically set as a rigid coupler with 1.2cm of slack for all wagons regardless of whether they are rigid couplers or not. Hence the reason why these wagons appeared to "work" ok.
Please advise if this corrects the problem.
#9
Posted 10 September 2018 - 02:21 AM
Now it's look like this.
https://zapodaj.net/images/7d5eaa8a63062.png
https://zapodaj.net/images/7d5eaa8a63062.png
#10
Posted 10 September 2018 - 02:48 AM