How to set tractive effort and such with ORTS in the .eng file?
#16
Posted 27 March 2017 - 09:40 PM
IMO the solution is to provide the means to use one .eng file for the assembly of one locomotive from several .s files. That would result in one .eng file so everything related to power, weight, etc. etc., is one place as it it should be. I don't know if the .fa method would work or whether something new needs to be done (the likely gotcha here is bogies appearing in different .s files). But until that problem is fixed there are a whole lot of locomotives whose performance will remain completely funky at best.
#17
Posted 28 March 2017 - 07:01 AM
#18
Posted 28 March 2017 - 07:51 AM
"Add in the wagon section of the loco.eng:
ORTSCarriages (
(
Pivot ( x.x y.y z.z )
Shape ( "shape.s")
ShapePivot ( x.x y.y z.z )
Flip ( 0 )
)
(
Pivot ( x.x y.y z.z )
Shape ( "othershape.s")
ShapePivot ( x.x y.y z.z )
Flip ( 1 )
)
)
Where x.x <> 0.0 allows for some lateral displacement.
That is useful for three trucks locos, where the central one have this movement.
"
Perhaps this proposal needs more discussion, but is a solution for most of the articulated locos, steeamers, electrics or diesel.
Regards.
#19
Posted 29 March 2017 - 10:29 AM
And I propose another question: Really do you think is the indicated power well calculated in modern steam locomotives? In this case, appears in HUD 2394 kW calculated power, but this engine had a performance of 3560kW. Not maximun, of course.
Well, you can see there are some new questions to discuss...
#20
Posted 29 March 2017 - 12:55 PM
#21
Posted 29 March 2017 - 03:12 PM
#22
Posted 29 March 2017 - 03:23 PM
copperpen, on 29 March 2017 - 12:55 PM, said:
Thank you. Hopefully we can find a solution to this problem soon
Genma Saotome, on 29 March 2017 - 03:12 PM, said:
Do not worry, nobody is free of confusion.
#23
Posted 30 March 2017 - 12:10 AM
Genma Saotome, on 29 March 2017 - 03:12 PM, said:
Jon Davis made several GN articulated and a B&O one, all one piece models. Several UK express steam locomotives also had 4 cylinders, but were not articulated. There were some articulated locomotives used in the UK, but they were freight locos and of the garret type, not Mallet style.
#24
Posted 05 July 2017 - 08:06 AM
Using steam locomotives we can discover what I think they are some mistakes in this type of engines. For instance...
Is it posible that the "blowback" effect doesn't appears inside the tunnels? yes, we could test whatever activity with tunnels, and this effect doesn't exist. I hope you are thinking to keep in mind by the future.
Are you thougth in steam locomotives feed with diésel, not only with coal? In last age of steam, USA an Europe used this locomotives, that were easier to drive and manage by the fireman. In this case, the "blowback" effect doesn´t exist, y we could maintain feeding inside the tunnels. I hope, again, you are thinking to keep in mind for the simulator.
Thank you very much.
#25
Posted 14 July 2017 - 10:02 AM
Here I copy a screenshot where we can watch what I think is a mistake: Would you see in reverse mode a disparity of indicated power and traction effort?
Thanks.
http://www.railclub.org/xavivilla/imagen/Open_Rails_2017-07-14 12-42-41.jpg
#26
Posted 14 July 2017 - 10:38 PM
#27
Posted 16 July 2017 - 01:32 PM