I have a consist where one of the locos is not appearing. The loco is a GP20 #2056 and #2066. I can find no misspelling in any of the files. I also checked the shape file with Conbuilder's Shape Fixer and found no problem. Activity log is below. Route being used on is Whitefish 9. The locos shapes and ace files do show up in Shapeviewer & Conbuilder jpg's.
AJ
Page 1 of 1
Missing loco in consist
#2
Posted 24 May 2015 - 01:23 AM
asteph627, on 23 May 2015 - 03:31 PM, said:
I have a consist where one of the locos is not appearing. The loco is a GP20 #2056 and #2066. I can find no misspelling in any of the files. I also checked the shape file with Conbuilder's Shape Fixer and found no problem. Activity log is below. Route being used on is Whitefish 9. The locos shapes and ace files do show up in Shapeviewer & Conbuilder jpg's.
AJ
AJ
No log visible. Which GP20s are they?
#3
Posted 24 May 2015 - 01:51 PM
They are 3DPM GP20's, I believe. Sending Log again
AJ
AJ
Attached File(s)
-
OpenRailsLog.txt (30.11K)
Number of downloads: 191
#4
Posted 24 May 2015 - 02:32 PM
Aren't those the 3DPM (Patrick Mahoney) that caused a kerfuffle in the year aught 4 earlier this century?
#5
Posted 24 May 2015 - 04:09 PM
:naughty: yep, maybe I should retire them, what do you think?
AJ
AJ
#6
Posted 24 May 2015 - 06:02 PM
Oh geeze, not my call. Although, there are some very nice GP20 packs over at BLW. I looked at the log and it refers to the shape file for the gp20, I'd look at it. My experience is nil with regard to shape files, I would open it and see if something looked suspicious but beyond that, don't know.
Warning: Expected end of block distance_levels; got more data in c:\msts\microsoft games\train simulator\trains\trainset\bn_gp20_2066\bn_gp20_2066.s:byte 147472
maybe some missing or extra brackets if OR expected to find an end of block?? wild guessing here.
Warning: Expected end of block distance_levels; got more data in c:\msts\microsoft games\train simulator\trains\trainset\bn_gp20_2066\bn_gp20_2066.s:byte 147472
maybe some missing or extra brackets if OR expected to find an end of block?? wild guessing here.
Page 1 of 1