Elvas Tower: Build 2500 - Big OOPS! - Elvas Tower

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Build 2500 - Big OOPS! Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   atsf37l 

  • Executive Vice President
  • Group: Status: First Class
  • Posts: 4,643
  • Joined: 25-February 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego
  • Simulator:ORTS
  • Country:

Posted 21 September 2014 - 05:35 PM

I know OR doesn't like the CrewCar* concept that is used for many of the narrow gauge steam engines, but I finally got them to work halfway decently working with builds prior to this one. Imagine my shock when I loaded a Rio Grande Southern freight train at Dolores and discovered this:
Attached Image: 2500 Oops 1.jpg

Not only was the tender missing but the train is in "runaway" mode. Even though the train is on level track with the regulator and reverser at zero with the engine brakes on full - 65 lbs in the brake cylinders - this puppy is trotting off to Rico as fast as its little wheels will carry it! A full set of the train brakes was required to get the critter stopped. The train acts as though the tender is actually there.


So where is the tender, you may ask?
Attached Image: 2500 Oops 2.jpg

That's Dolores down there about 1000 feet below and a half mile away!

What's up guys! I'm headed back to Build 2460!

Ahhh, that's better!
Attached Image: 2500 Oops 3.jpg


* CrewCar: An essentially zero length wagon file used to install a crew into a locomotive when the locomotive and tender have already used up their FreightAnim lines for boiler details on the engine and coal in the tender. Set up between the locomotive and tender in the consist. This was done to counter the FA trick to split the parts of a highly detailed model to trick MSTS into running the engine.

#2 User is offline   atsf37l 

  • Executive Vice President
  • Group: Status: First Class
  • Posts: 4,643
  • Joined: 25-February 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego
  • Simulator:ORTS
  • Country:

Posted 21 September 2014 - 06:01 PM

OK, well, now that we have had a good chuckle, it turns out the only engine with the flying tender is the 41 - of course the locomotive I chose to test the latest build. Still going back to 2460 however until y'all get the steam and smoke thing sorted out. Now to go look at the hierarchy of that tender's trucks....... ;)

#3 User is offline   R H Steele 

  • Executive Vice President
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: ET Admin
  • Posts: 3,446
  • Joined: 14-March 13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:known universe
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 21 September 2014 - 10:47 PM

That's the first good/verified photographic evidence I"ve seen on the web of a UFSO - an unidentified flying steam object. ;)

#4 User is offline   edwardk 

  • Open Rails Developer
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 1,350
  • Joined: 11-December 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chula Vista, CA
  • Simulator:MSTS
  • Country:

Posted 21 September 2014 - 11:13 PM

View Postatsf37l, on 21 September 2014 - 05:35 PM, said:

I know OR doesn't like the CrewCar* concept that is used for many of the narrow gauge steam engines, but I finally got them to work halfway decently working with builds prior to this one. Imagine my shock when I loaded a Rio Grande Southern freight train at Dolores and discovered this:
Attachment 2500 Oops 1.jpg

Not only was the tender missing but the train is in "runaway" mode. Even though the train is on level track with the regulator and reverser at zero with the engine brakes on full - 65 lbs in the brake cylinders - this puppy is trotting off to Rico as fast as its little wheels will carry it! A full set of the train brakes was required to get the critter stopped. The train acts as though the tender is actually there.


So where is the tender, you may ask?
Attachment 2500 Oops 2.jpg

That's Dolores down there about 1000 feet below and a half mile away!

What's up guys! I'm headed back to Build 2460!

Ahhh, that's better!
Attachment 2500 Oops 3.jpg


* CrewCar: An essentially zero length wagon file used to install a crew into a locomotive when the locomotive and tender have already used up their FreightAnim lines for boiler details on the engine and coal in the tender. Set up between the locomotive and tender in the consist. This was done to counter the FA trick to split the parts of a highly detailed model to trick MSTS into running the engine.



Have you tried V2509? If not, give it a shot. Is this locomotive freeware and if so where can I find it?

Edward K.

#5 User is offline   captain_bazza 

  • Chairman, Board of Directors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: ET Admin
  • Posts: 13,927
  • Joined: 21-February 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Way, way, way, South
  • Simulator:MSTS & OR
  • Country:

Posted 21 September 2014 - 11:53 PM

Now, remind me, who said, "The Truth is out there."?http://www.elvastower.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/pleasantry.gif"!!??"

CB.

#6 User is offline   edwardk 

  • Open Rails Developer
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 1,350
  • Joined: 11-December 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chula Vista, CA
  • Simulator:MSTS
  • Country:

Posted 22 September 2014 - 12:18 AM

I am able to get the tender sitting on the track as it should, but w/o the invisible crew cab. I just want to confirm that you were able to have the invisible crew cab along with the tender working in V2460?

Edward K.

#7 User is offline   atsf37l 

  • Executive Vice President
  • Group: Status: First Class
  • Posts: 4,643
  • Joined: 25-February 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego
  • Simulator:ORTS
  • Country:

Posted 22 September 2014 - 12:21 AM

"There's the signpost up ahead. You've just entered the Twilight Zone." :)

Edward, you can find the 41 here in the file library in three different versions, along with her sister engines 40, 42 and the T-19's 20, 22 and 25. And yes, it works fine in 2460. But there are problems with the front truck which are revealing themselves in OR. Hopefully, OR versions of 40, 41 and 42 won't be too far off. ;)

#8 User is offline   rdamurphy 

  • Open Rails Developer
  • Group: Private - Open Rails Developer
  • Posts: 1,199
  • Joined: 04-May 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thornton, CO
  • Simulator:MSTS - OR
  • Country:

Posted 22 September 2014 - 12:47 AM

Apparently, you don't spank your steam locomotives enough. Otherwise, they'd have a tender behind...

Robert

#9 User is offline   Hawk 

  • Engineer
  • Group: Status: Active Member
  • Posts: 549
  • Joined: 19-January 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Simulator:MSTS
  • Country:

Posted 22 September 2014 - 06:30 AM

View Postrdamurphy, on 22 September 2014 - 12:47 AM, said:

Apparently, you don't spank your steam locomotives enough. Otherwise, they'd have a tender behind...

Robert


That is so corny it's funny. :p

#10 User is offline   thegrindre 

  • Member, Board of Directors
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 8,349
  • Joined: 10-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Now in central Arkansas
  • Simulator:MSTS & Trainz '04 & Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 22 September 2014 - 07:35 AM

View Postrdamurphy, on 22 September 2014 - 12:47 AM, said:

Apparently, you don't spank your steam locomotives enough. Otherwise, they'd have a tender behind...

Robert

View PostHawk, on 22 September 2014 - 06:30 AM, said:

That is so corny it's funny. :sleep:

It made me laugh out load. :lol2:

:p

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users