Elvas Tower: X2381-Wheel Slip - Elvas Tower

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

X2381-Wheel Slip Rate Topic: -----

#11 User is offline   Serana 

  • Conductor
  • Group: Status: Contributing Member
  • Posts: 489
  • Joined: 21-February 13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St Cyr l'Ecole (France)
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 03 August 2014 - 11:38 AM

Indeed, I didn't do dynamic tests on the steam and diesel locomotives.
Usually, I do my tests on electric locomotives. And in this case, there were important differences in the other type of locomotives.
I will have to be more cautious in the future.

#12 User is offline   copperpen 

  • Executive Vice President
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 3,144
  • Joined: 08-August 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Simulator:MSTS & OR
  • Country:

Posted 03 August 2014 - 11:44 AM

View PostSerana, on 03 August 2014 - 11:38 AM, said:

Indeed, I didn't do dynamic tests on the steam and diesel locomotives.
Usually, I do my tests on electric locomotives. And in this case, there were important differences in the other type of locomotives.
I will have to be more cautious in the future.


That is what dedicated testers are for. There are some of us about.

#13 User is offline   cjakeman 

  • Vice President
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: ET Admin
  • Posts: 2,876
  • Joined: 03-May 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Peterborough, UK
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 03 August 2014 - 01:33 PM

View PostSerana, on 03 August 2014 - 11:38 AM, said:

I will have to be more cautious in the future.

I don't think this is the response Copperpen might have been hoping for.

The way I see it, he is encouraging you not to do more testing yourself before you release but to recruit some testers to help you. Some of the Dev Team are not coders but testers and there are others not on the Dev Team who also help with testing.

Just my thoughts,

#14 User is offline   Serana 

  • Conductor
  • Group: Status: Contributing Member
  • Posts: 489
  • Joined: 21-February 13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St Cyr l'Ecole (France)
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 03 August 2014 - 02:15 PM

Ah, OK. Sorry, I didn't understand it that way.

Thank you.

#15 User is online   engmod 

  • Open Rails Developer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: ET Admin
  • Posts: 1,791
  • Joined: 26-February 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eltham, Victoria, Australia
  • Simulator:ORNYMG
  • Country:

Posted 03 August 2014 - 04:26 PM

Serana,

Thank you for your quick response to the problem, much appreciated.

cheers

#16 User is offline   gpz 

  • Superintendant
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 1,772
  • Joined: 27-October 12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Budapest
  • Simulator:OpenRails
  • Country:

Posted 04 August 2014 - 02:56 AM

View Postcopperpen, on 03 August 2014 - 11:29 AM, said:

That is what testing is supposed to pick up. No code should ever be released with a bug like this in it.

But as a defense to Serana, it must be taken into account that an svn commit is not a code "release" technically. That is just a commit subject to testing, what was done by you, and based on that the code was corrected eventually. So nothing happened that is against the regular workflow...

#17 User is offline   Buttercup 

  • Conductor
  • Group: Status: Contributing Member
  • Posts: 426
  • Joined: 24-July 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:

Posted 04 August 2014 - 03:39 AM

"Experimental" releases.

#18 User is offline   beresford 

  • Fireman
  • Group: Status: Active Member
  • Posts: 153
  • Joined: 06-January 14
  • Simulator:msts
  • Country:

Posted 04 August 2014 - 05:08 AM

Will this fix the situation where you get 'Wheelslip -Reduced tractive effort' messages beeping on and off when you are using the dynamic brake and therefore not expending tractive effort in the first place?

#19 User is offline   copperpen 

  • Executive Vice President
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 3,144
  • Joined: 08-August 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Simulator:MSTS & OR
  • Country:

Posted 04 August 2014 - 06:49 AM

View Postberesford, on 04 August 2014 - 05:08 AM, said:

Will this fix the situation where you get 'Wheelslip -Reduced tractive effort' messages beeping on and off when you are using the dynamic brake and therefore not expending tractive effort in the first place?

Not something I have seen, but no, this was a problem introduced by some code changes in 2381, since rectified to stop that particular error.

Looking at the situation described, it is a valid message because too much dynamic brake can cause the engine wheels to skid instead of brake specially if the train brake is also in use without bailing the engine brakes off.

#20 User is offline   cjakeman 

  • Vice President
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: ET Admin
  • Posts: 2,876
  • Joined: 03-May 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Peterborough, UK
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 04 August 2014 - 10:05 AM

View Postgpz, on 04 August 2014 - 02:56 AM, said:

But as a defense to Serana, it must be taken into account that an svn commit is not a code "release" technically. That is just a commit subject to testing, what was done by you, and based on that the code was corrected eventually. So nothing happened that is against the regular workflow...

James is looking into an automatic procedure where a commit is not posted to the public until it's a week old. The idea is that we have a week to find and then either fix any show-stoppers or block that commit from reaching the website.

This procedure is described on the website as the Safe Update Setting but not yet in place.

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users