Elvas Tower: General screenshot thread for MSTS / OR - Elvas Tower

Jump to content

  • 92 Pages +
  • « First
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

General screenshot thread for MSTS / OR Rate Topic: ****- 2 Votes

#1366 User is offline   Whatever2006 

  • Fireman
  • Group: Posts: Active Member
  • Posts: 103
  • Joined: 26-March 24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere in Metro Manila
  • Simulator:Open Rails and Trainz
  • Country:

Posted 14 April 2025 - 06:14 PM

Santa Fe Railway GE C44-9W #666, the 'Devil' War Bonnet on Seligman.

https://i.imgur.com/lkb7ps3.png
https://i.imgur.com/VOYlxss.png
https://i.imgur.com/VWjgyyg.png

#1367 User is offline   Weter 

  • Member, Board of Directors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: ET Admin Group
  • Posts: 8,921
  • Joined: 01-June 20
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Simulator:ORTS
  • Country:

Posted 11 May 2025 - 10:27 AM

Attached Image: 220_01.jpg

#1368 User is offline   jsmr 

  • Apprentice
  • Group: Posts: Active Member
  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: 19-April 25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:BCS, Mexico
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 19 May 2025 - 01:47 PM

Some Aussie B Class action.

Attached Image: Open Rails 2025-05-14 07-33-26.jpeg


Attached Image: Open Rails 2025-05-14 07-39-37.jpeg


Attached Image: Open Rails 2025-05-14 08-10-34.jpeg

#1369 User is offline   Weter 

  • Member, Board of Directors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: ET Admin Group
  • Posts: 8,921
  • Joined: 01-June 20
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Simulator:ORTS
  • Country:

Posted 19 May 2025 - 11:53 PM

Cool.
That's likely those very locos, Derek told about.
(2-cab Co-Co E analogs)

#1370 User is offline   BNSFfan 

  • Apprentice
  • Group: Posts: Active Member
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 02-November 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rosemead, CA
  • Simulator:MSTS & Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 26 June 2025 - 01:41 PM

Here's a pair of photos taken on the Shasta Route.

Photo 1: ex DRGW GP60 3156, now SP 3156, passes underneath Mt Shasta as it leads the eastbound LAPCX- The Pacific Coast Express, from Los Angeles north on its way to Portland. While the train is heading north Geographically, it is heading timetable east, since it is heading away from San Francisco. On the SP, all trains heading towards SF were considered westbound, away from SF was eastbound.
Attached Image: Open Rails 2025-06-24 10-23-33.jpeg

Photo 2: SP SD45R 7531 leads the westbound PTLAF, the Portland, OR to Los Angeles, CA Forwarder as it passes under Mt Shasta near the same area as the first photo on a different day.
Attached Image: Open Rails 2025-06-25 11-59-40.jpeg

#1371 User is offline   engmod 

  • Open Rails Developer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: ET Admin Group
  • Posts: 2,183
  • Joined: 26-February 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eltham, Victoria, Australia
  • Simulator:ORNYMG
  • Country:

Posted 26 June 2025 - 02:01 PM

>Some Aussie B Class action

Yes, they used to run in front of my childhood house.

#1372 User is offline   timmuir 

  • Member since Nov. 2003
  • Group: Status: First Class
  • Posts: 9,868
  • Joined: 22-November 03
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Somewhere on the Beautiful Oregon Coast
  • Simulator:Open Rails Only
  • Country:

Posted 27 June 2025 - 12:26 PM

View Postengmod, on 26 June 2025 - 02:01 PM, said:

>Some Aussie B Class action

Yes, they used to run in front of my childhood house.

Now, THAT would be cool. I love those double-ender streamliners.

#1373 User is offline   timmuir 

  • Member since Nov. 2003
  • Group: Status: First Class
  • Posts: 9,868
  • Joined: 22-November 03
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Somewhere on the Beautiful Oregon Coast
  • Simulator:Open Rails Only
  • Country:

Posted 27 June 2025 - 12:38 PM

Showcasing Allen's superb Santa Fe 4000 Mikado (May of 2009), Northbound, making an appearance on the old AT&SF entry into Santa Monica, via Inglewood (now owned by Pacific Eclectic Ry.).

Attached Image: Open Rails 2025-06-26 12-50-53.jpg

In PE's "Trolleyway", Southbound, passing Ocean Park.

Attached Image: Open Rails 2025-06-26 12-58-30.jpg

Thanks.

#1374 User is offline   railguy 

  • Engineer
  • Group: Posts: Contributing Member
  • Posts: 742
  • Joined: 10-October 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 28 June 2025 - 06:25 AM

View PostBNSFfan, on 26 June 2025 - 01:41 PM, said:

Here's a pair of photos taken on the Shasta Route. Photo 1: ex DRGW GP60 3156, now SP 3156, passes underneath Mt Shasta as it leads the eastbound LAPCX- The Pacific Coast Express, from Los Angeles north on its way to Portland.


Just a point of order here: Regardless of ownership, DRGW 3156 would still be referred to as "DRGW 3156" in any Dispatcher communications, manifests, etc. because it contains no reporting mark that would identify it as anything else. And, DRGW, MP, CNW, WP, SP, MKT, CMO, etc. are all still valid reporting marks, even though all of them are now Union Pacific reporting marks. So, for example, a former Chicago & Northwestern hopper car still carrying a CNW reporting mark would be referred to as a CNW or Chicago & Northwestern car even though it has been owned by UP since the CNW was merged into the UP. Absent of a reporting mark, as the case with 3156 in the screenshot, it would be called out as what it appears to be, a D&RGW unit, even though it is owned by the SP in this "SP era" screenshot. Now, if it was stenciled with an "SP" reporting mark below the number on the cab, THEN it would be referred to as "SP 3156." The reasons for this are obvious. It is possible that there already was an SP 3156 on the SP roster. As a historical note, SP did very little "patching" (if any) of former D&RGW locomotives after the SP/D&RGW merger--if they did anything, it was usually a full repaint and renumber into SP livery. Mostly, though, the SP just left them as D&RGW locomotives. After the UP/SP merger, the UP got busy "patching" the former D&RGW locos, renumbering them into the UP number scheme. Taking this a bit farther, that is why the various "heritage" locos operated by UP, NS, CSX, etc. always have their respective reporting mark displayed on the locomotive--to remove any confusion.

In real world railfanning, it's lots of fun to study reporting marks to understand who actually owns what running on the rails. Private non-railroad car owners always have an "X" as the last character of the reporting mark, e.g. CITX. That is why the common carrier CSX Railroad's reporting mark is "CSXT", so that its equipment is not confused with a private car. One strange exception is TTX Corporation, it is a private car owning corporation, but the TTX company itself is owned by a consortium of railroads. Also, there are some shortline railroads that effectively operate as car leasing companies. An example from the SP era in the 1990's was the Central Of Tennessee Railway and Navigation Co. (reporting mark CTRN). At the time, it was owned by billionaire Philip Anschutz, the then owner of the SP. Then Central Of Tennessee Railway and Navigation Co. was 25 miles in length, but owned thousands of railcars, including mostly coal hoppers and grain hoppers. Those cars were included in the SP (Anschutz)/UP merger, and the CTRN reporting mark is now assigned to the UP and is still in regular use.

#1375 User is offline   Weter 

  • Member, Board of Directors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: ET Admin Group
  • Posts: 8,921
  • Joined: 01-June 20
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Simulator:ORTS
  • Country:

Posted 28 June 2025 - 11:43 AM

Hello.
For me - very useful info to learn. Thanks.
So NATX GATX and so on are from there.
Abs what first three letters mean then?

#1376 User is offline   BNSFfan 

  • Apprentice
  • Group: Posts: Active Member
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 02-November 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rosemead, CA
  • Simulator:MSTS & Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 28 June 2025 - 12:34 PM

View Postrailguy, on 28 June 2025 - 06:25 AM, said:

Just a point of order here: Regardless of ownership, DRGW 3156 would still be referred to as "DRGW 3156" in any Dispatcher communications, manifests, etc. because it contains no reporting mark that would identify it as anything else. And, DRGW, MP, CNW, WP, SP, MKT, CMO, etc. are all still valid reporting marks, even though all of them are now Union Pacific reporting marks. So, for example, a former Chicago & Northwestern hopper car still carrying a CNW reporting mark would be referred to as a CNW or Chicago & Northwestern car even though it has been owned by UP since the CNW was merged into the UP. Absent of a reporting mark, as the case with 3156 in the screenshot, it would be called out as what it appears to be, a D&RGW unit, even though it is owned by the SP in this "SP era" screenshot. Now, if it was stenciled with an "SP" reporting mark below the number on the cab, THEN it would be referred to as "SP 3156." The reasons for this are obvious. It is possible that there already was an SP 3156 on the SP roster. As a historical note, SP did very little "patching" (if any) of former D&RGW locomotives after the SP/D&RGW merger--if they did anything, it was usually a full repaint and renumber into SP livery. Mostly, though, the SP just left them as D&RGW locomotives. After the UP/SP merger, the UP got busy "patching" the former D&RGW locos, renumbering them into the UP number scheme. Taking this a bit farther, that is why the various "heritage" locos operated by UP, NS, CSX, etc. always have their respective reporting mark displayed on the locomotive--to remove any confusion.

In real world railfanning, it's lots of fun to study reporting marks to understand who actually owns what running on the rails. Private non-railroad car owners always have an "X" as the last character of the reporting mark, e.g. CITX. That is why the common carrier CSX Railroad's reporting mark is "CSXT", so that its equipment is not confused with a private car. One strange exception is TTX Corporation, it is a private car owning corporation, but the TTX company itself is owned by a consortium of railroads. Also, there are some shortline railroads that effectively operate as car leasing companies. An example from the SP era in the 1990's was the Central Of Tennessee Railway and Navigation Co. (reporting mark CTRN). At the time, it was owned by billionaire Philip Anschutz, the then owner of the SP. Then Central Of Tennessee Railway and Navigation Co. was 25 miles in length, but owned thousands of railcars, including mostly coal hoppers and grain hoppers. Those cars were included in the SP (Anschutz)/UP merger, and the CTRN reporting mark is now assigned to the UP and is still in regular use.


Funny enough, I actually knew that already. I just didn't think of it at the time when I uploaded the pictures.

#1377 User is offline   CrisGer 

  • Member, Board of Directors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: ET Admin Group
  • Posts: 5,554
  • Joined: 06-October 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado and California
  • Simulator:MSTS OR
  • Country:

Posted 28 June 2025 - 12:47 PM

that is a very nice Mikado by Allen and great pics from you Tim. Not often get to see big metal in a city street like that. is a fun juxstaposition. (sp?) fun and also love the details Railguy, very very inters4eting to know about reporting marks. thanks for sharing all of that

Chris

#1378 User is offline   Weter 

  • Member, Board of Directors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: ET Admin Group
  • Posts: 8,921
  • Joined: 01-June 20
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Simulator:ORTS
  • Country:

Posted 13 July 2025 - 12:07 PM

Wetlands by Evgeniy Santo (Savelovo 2 route)
Attached Image: Kal_07b.jpgAttached Image: Kal_07c.jpg

  • 92 Pages +
  • « First
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users