Elvas Tower: Issue with advanced adhesion after save/load - Elvas Tower

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Issue with advanced adhesion after save/load Rate Topic: -----

#21 User is offline   Csantucci 

  • Member, Board of Directors
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 5,699
  • Joined: 31-December 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:

Posted 24 May 2021 - 07:38 AM

This probably means that the behaviour depends also from the other pending pull requests that are present in the Unstable release; maybe it's the pull request about the poweron features. I don't know how that has been stabilized, so at the moment I didn't port it in the ORNYMG release.
Do the diesel locos manage correctly the save / resume issues with wheelslip?

#22 User is offline   Csantucci 

  • Member, Board of Directors
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 5,699
  • Joined: 31-December 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:

Posted 24 May 2021 - 08:11 AM

I have tested, and it works here.
Resume, before unpausing
Attached Image: Before.jpg

After unpausing
Attached Image: After.jpg

I commented out the 4 circuit breaker lines like you
 comment (        ORTSCircuitBreaker ( Manual ))
 comment  (     ORTSCircuitBreakerClosingDelay ( 0.22s ))
  comment (      ORTSPowerOnDelay ( 1s ))
 comment (       ORTSAuxPowerOnDelay ( 18s ))


#23 User is offline   steamer_ctn 

  • Open Rails Developer
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 1,415
  • Joined: 24-June 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:

Posted 24 May 2021 - 08:18 PM

View PostCsantucci, on 24 May 2021 - 07:38 AM, said:

This probably means that the behaviour depends also from the other pending pull requests that are present in the Unstable release; maybe it's the pull request about the poweron features. I don't know how that has been stabilized, so at the moment I didn't port it in the ORNYMG release.

My suspicion is that the circuit breaker details may not being resumed correctly for Electric Locomotives.

I made a note in the power PR for the developer to check, but I am not aware if it has been done or not.

#24 User is offline   hroch 

  • Fireman
  • Group: Status: Active Member
  • Posts: 177
  • Joined: 05-June 14
  • Gender:Male
  • Simulator:MSTS OR
  • Country:

Posted 25 May 2021 - 01:12 AM

Yes Carlo, diesel locomotives manage correctly the save/resume issues with wheelslip.
Resume, before unpausing
Attached Image: 749after_save_before_cancel_pauze.jpg
After unpausing
Attached Image: 749after_save_after_ceancel_pause.jpg


I tested with an electric locomotive with an active circuit breaker. No commented circuit breaker. It works correctly in the official experimental version.
The power is switched off in the MG NY 99 version after save/resume before unpausing.
I commented on the circuit breaker, because I needed to find out why some electric locomotives have the power off after save / load and others not.

#25 User is offline   Csantucci 

  • Member, Board of Directors
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 5,699
  • Joined: 31-December 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:

Posted 25 May 2021 - 09:03 AM

Hi hroch,
thanks for the test. In a hopefully next future the improvements to electric locomotives power supply will be inserted also in the testing version, and at that point I'll port them also to the ORNYMG version.

#26 User is offline   Serana 

  • Conductor
  • Group: Status: Active Member
  • Posts: 373
  • Joined: 21-February 13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St Cyr l'Ecole (France)
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 26 May 2021 - 02:49 PM

Hi,

In the power supply package, nothing has really changed about the behaviour of the circuit breaker and the power on state should be the same with the modified code.

Could it be something provoked from the fact that timers can't be saved and restored in scripts (even the default ones)?

#27 User is offline   Csantucci 

  • Member, Board of Directors
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 5,699
  • Joined: 31-December 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:

Posted 27 May 2021 - 12:46 AM

C├ędric,
thanks for the clarification, however there is something which makes the difference in the Unstable release. I did some other tests:
1) Testing version (no steamer's PR, no Serana's PR) NOK
2) ORNYMG 99 (yes steamer's PR, no Serana's PR) NOK
3) Unstable (yes steamer's PR, yes Serana's PR) OK.

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users