Missing Loose Consists Consists Exist in Activity Editor but Are Missing in the Sim
#1
Posted 09 September 2020 - 11:58 AM
The obvious question is, am I sure I'm working in the same activity that I'm operating in when running the sim, and the answer is absolutely yes. I have verified that more times than I want to think about and have actually gone the extra step of hiding any other activities that might exist in the route in an entirely separate folder.
So I'm wondering if anyone else has experienced this & if so, what did you do about it. Any/all thoughts are greatly appreciated. clint
#2
Posted 10 September 2020 - 04:11 PM
Nighthawk72, on 09 September 2020 - 11:58 AM, said:
The obvious question is, am I sure I'm working in the same activity that I'm operating in when running the sim, and the answer is absolutely yes. I have verified that more times than I want to think about and have actually gone the extra step of hiding any other activities that might exist in the route in an entirely separate folder.
So I'm wondering if anyone else has experienced this & if so, what did you do about it. Any/all thoughts are greatly appreciated. clint
Not clear with what you are saying. Loose Consists are listed in the ACT file. They are not consist files within the Activities folder; they are sections within that ACT file.
The TSRE-AE uses the entry in its Consist Editor for "filename" to fill out the TrainCfg line as in TrainCfg ( "Static Box Cars XYZ siding" ) where as the MSTS AE just enters TrainCfg ( "" ) in the ACT files it creates. Also the TSRE-AE uses the Description line entry for the Name line following the TrainCfg lin where as the MSTS AE enters Name ( "Loose Consist' ) for every loose consist. This allows the Activity creator to clearly identify what is in a consist and where it is placed in the route. Thus when a user needs to edit a loose consist he can make an educated decision as the what type of wagon to use as replacement, this not putting a refer on a siding at a rock quarry.
#3
Posted 10 September 2020 - 06:41 PM
cr-stagg, on 10 September 2020 - 04:11 PM, said:
The TSRE-AE uses the entry in its Consist Editor for "filename" to fill out the TrainCfg line as in TrainCfg ( "Static Box Cars XYZ siding" ) where as the MSTS AE just enters TrainCfg ( "" ) in the ACT files it creates. Also the TSRE-AE uses the Description line entry for the Name line following the TrainCfg lin where as the MSTS AE enters Name ( "Loose Consist' ) for every loose consist. This allows the Activity creator to clearly identify what is in a consist and where it is placed in the route. Thus when a user needs to edit a loose consist he can make an educated decision as the what type of wagon to use as replacement, this not putting a refer on a siding at a rock quarry.
Charles: Thank you for your response. What I am saying is that the information relating to each of the loose consists I added to the activity is contained w/n the route's Activity Folder under a separate Activity Object section for each loose consist. Information contained in that Activity Object Section includes the Object Type, TrainCfg info that identifies the train/consist name, Serial, MaxVelocity, NewWagonUID, Durability setting, followed by a list of each engine & wagon in the consist, followed by the Direction, ID, & Tile location. The information I was attempting to convey was that the route's Activity Folder contains all of the above information for each of the loose consists I have added to the route. And, each of those consists show up in the AE when I open it. However, when I launch the sim, only those consists that were added @ the time the activity was created appear in the sim. None of the consists added the following day or several days later appear in the sim, although their relevant information is contained in the Activity Folder & the consist appears in the Activity Editor when I reopen it.
Interestingly enough, I have also added numerous AI consists @ various times & this problem does not seem to impact AI services or traffic....only loose consists added @ random location along the route.
Sorry for the confusion. Hope this clarifies. clint
#4
Posted 11 September 2020 - 09:58 AM
Do you happen to have an OR Log.txt file from aa run of the ACT with missing loose consists you can post?
Do the Loose Consists also exist in your Trains\Consists folder? Can you test them with a Consist file tester? Looking for particularly missing Shape files.
#5
Posted 12 September 2020 - 08:02 AM
As an experiment, I also added some random scenery objects to see if they appeared in the sim & all of those objects were in fact present. So, to me, that suggests that you are correct in that the problem may be w/the consists themselves. I use the TSRE5 Consist Editor to create/modify all consists, & have been using it w/o any apparent problems for more than a year. All of the consists are present in that consist folder.
I am not familiar w/the consist tester you are referring to. Where might I find it & I will certainly give it a try & see what happens. thx...clint
Attached File(s)
-
2020-09-12 (1).jpg (417.62K)
Number of downloads: 0 -
2020-09-12.jpg (539.39K)
Number of downloads: 1 -
OpenRailsLog.txt (220.25K)
Number of downloads: 6
#6
Posted 12 September 2020 - 10:15 AM
Have you looked at the Log File? You could spend 3 days fixing all the problems reported there. With the numerous Not a Number "Nan" errors in the Loose Consist area of the ACT file it is impossible to tell what is wrong. Also you have numerous suffix N/m errors. Those are probably on Coupler Dampning lines where the suffix should be N/m/s not N/m.
The Consist testers I was referring to were the CEs ConBuilder and Convoi, and the Utility RouteRiter.
Could you also post your Transition Era-1945-55.act? I want to check it for extraneous Closing Parens as that could cause the sim to stop reading the ACT file.
#7
Posted 12 September 2020 - 10:27 AM
cr-stagg, on 12 September 2020 - 10:15 AM, said:
Have you looked at the Log File? You could spend 3 days fixing all the problems reported there. With the numerous Not a Number "Nan" errors in the Loose Consist area of the ACT file it is impossible to tell what is wrong. Also you have numerous suffix N/m errors. Those are probably on Coupler Dampning lines where the suffix should be N/m/s not N/m.
The Consist testers I was referring to were the CEs ConBuilder and Convoi, and the Utility RouteRiter.
Could you also post your Transition Era-1945-55.act? I want to check it for extraneous Closing Parens as that could cause the sim to stop reading the ACT file.
#8
Posted 12 September 2020 - 10:33 AM
Sorry, but I have to leave in a few minutes & will be out the remainder of today. Will get back on this tomorrow. Thanks for your help & comments. Back tomorrow...c
#9
Posted 12 September 2020 - 12:29 PM
Nighthawk72, on 12 September 2020 - 10:33 AM, said:
Sorry, but I have to leave in a few minutes & will be out the remainder of today. Will get back on this tomorrow. Thanks for your help & comments. Back tomorrow...c
#10
Posted 13 September 2020 - 03:29 PM
First, I have attached a zipped copy of the activity to this post. Next, if I interpret your last post correctly, the short version is that I have a lot of corrupted engine & rolling stock files & those files have in turn corrupted some of my consist files which have in turn caused those particular consists to become non-functional in the sim. Although I primarily use the TSRE Consist Editor, I do have a version of ConBuilder installed on this pc, so hopefully, I can utilize the CE in CB to fix some of the mess. Pls let me know if you find any errors in the attached activity. Thx again for your assistance. clint
Attached File(s)
-
Transition Era-1945-55.zip (51.73K)
Number of downloads: 6