steamer_ctn, on 08 January 2021 - 04:48 PM, said:
Can you provide specific details and reference material?
Hello.
A reduction in performance would be expected with rising altitude. The vacuum exhauster/pump or ejector system would work optimally at sea level where it would be able to generate maximum vacuum. Sea level being 29in Hg, and assuming perfect efficiency, achieving 21in Hg or so vacuum (i.e. a reduction in the system down to 8in Hg), I am just using the british system as a reference.
When gaining altitude, around 1in Hg is lost every 1000ft. This is probably negligible up to several thousand ft, but would come into play both on the performance of the exhauster (i.e. how much vacuum it can generate).
I found several references to the effect of altitude on vacuum brakes in trains, listed below:-
https://www.quora.co...ilway-mechanism
The American Railroad Passenger Car, Part 2 By John H. White: pg 548
https://en.wikipedia...s_vacuum_brakes
https://news.ycombin...tem?id=20455302
None of them really go into technical details unfortunately
And more general for vacuum device peformance at altitude, this at least has some numbers.
https://www.schmalz....uum-technology/
Interestingly, the last rail related link does mention "negative marketing" by Westinghouse to discredit the Vacuum brake in the US, precisely for this reason, being that many railways operate there at higher altitudes. I wonder how much is actual fact vs hype.