BLW/ZT PRR Centipede has no headlight beam Maybe It's a Bug
#11
Posted 11 January 2018 - 10:48 AM
#12
Posted 11 January 2018 - 11:49 AM
copperpen, on 11 January 2018 - 10:48 AM, said:
I can certainly test reversing the direction of the cone.
#13
Posted 11 January 2018 - 12:20 PM
copperpen, on 11 January 2018 - 10:48 AM, said:
There is no parameter in the cone of light code for direction. It is hard coded to 'forward', I assume. Looking at the train from the rear, there is no rear facing cone of light. The entire sky is lighter in OR than it is in MSTS, the lighter view you saw on the right (left in the photo below) is some weeds that are lighter than the rest of the foliage.
#14
Posted 14 January 2018 - 03:09 AM
#15
Posted 14 January 2018 - 05:36 AM
#16
Posted 14 January 2018 - 10:11 AM
or in my ALvia S-130,
both composite units, the front beam works correctly.
But both loco consists are .wag .eng .wag
The .wag carries the wheels and the .eng, with no wheels, carries the power and the lights.
It seems that OR refuses to put a beam in the second engine.
Regards.
#17
Posted 14 January 2018 - 11:10 AM
rfranzosa, on 14 January 2018 - 05:36 AM, said:
I suppose that whoever wrote this section of code never considered that the cone of light may not be on a lead eng file, just add it to the list of things that still need to be sorted out. Problem is far as I know we are a bit short of code writers atm.
#18
Posted 14 January 2018 - 11:50 AM
And the thing works fine.
In my opinion there is no need to correct the code.
Regards.
#19
Posted 14 January 2018 - 01:09 PM
#20
Posted 14 January 2018 - 01:18 PM
copperpen, on 14 January 2018 - 11:10 AM, said:
Very good point about shortage of code writers. I will try to find a workaround.
Thanks
Rick