Activity randomizing
#71
Posted 27 December 2017 - 11:55 AM
Here are my testing results after some 21 hours of driving, with Activity randomizing set to 3:
- one loco failure (unpowered boogie)
- one car wheel skid (but this has no consequeces - or has it?)
For me, these results look reasonable.
Note: Carlo, in your post #10 here, you nentioned "freight car with brakes stuck" - I never experienced this. (I periodically check F9 window for red car numbers.)
Thanks for your work,
Mirek
BTW: Weather random changes are marvelous!
- one loco failure (unpowered boogie)
- one car wheel skid (but this has no consequeces - or has it?)
For me, these results look reasonable.
Note: Carlo, in your post #10 here, you nentioned "freight car with brakes stuck" - I never experienced this. (I periodically check F9 window for red car numbers.)
Thanks for your work,
Mirek
BTW: Weather random changes are marvelous!
#72
Posted 04 January 2018 - 08:04 PM
Um... what is the "MG thread"? What is the "MG version"?
#73
Posted 05 January 2018 - 12:55 AM
shadowmane, on 04 January 2018 - 08:04 PM, said:
Um... what is the "MG thread"? What is the "MG version"?
http://www.elvastowe...4-gb-of-memory/
#74
Posted 05 January 2018 - 12:57 AM
mirekkr, on 27 December 2017 - 11:55 AM, said:
Note: Carlo, in your post #10 here, you nentioned "freight car with brakes stuck" - I never experienced this. (I periodically check F9 window for red car numbers.)
Brakes stuck probability increases with brake application time. Brake application time is especially significant on long descents. I have tested this in the Rollins pass freeware route.
#75
Posted 05 January 2018 - 06:27 AM
Thanks Carlo for your answer. I'll focus on it.
Mirek
Mirek
#76
#78
Posted 06 January 2018 - 05:58 AM
Sorry to go off-topic. I probably should have asked that question on the other thread.
#79
Posted 06 January 2018 - 07:05 AM
This don't run on Windows XP, does it? Because XP is telling me it's not a valid win32 application.
#80
Posted 07 January 2018 - 12:58 PM
Correct, it doesn't run on XP, because it is based on packages and software calls that XP does not support.