Elvas Tower: Same problem with DBHP display on steam engines - Elvas Tower

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Same problem with DBHP display on steam engines Wrong data display with X3877

#1 User is offline   Jean-Paul 

  • Apprentice
  • Group: First Class
  • Posts: 42
  • Joined: 28-October 14
  • Gender:Male
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 18 June 2017 - 11:45 AM

Hi !
It seems that the problem mentioned (and resolved) with X3869 comes back : for certain values of cut-off (40-60 %), on flat ground, displayed values of DBHP are higher than the IHP ones (for steam engines, of course).
Thanks for your help !
Jean-Paul

#2 User is offline   steamer_ctn 

  • Open Rails Developer
  • Group: Contributing Member
  • Posts: 750
  • Joined: 24-June 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:

Posted 18 June 2017 - 03:08 PM

I have run some test stock, and cannot see this problem.

Can you provide a scenario description where it occurs with CTN test stock or MSTS default stock so that I can duplicate (see) the issue that you are describing?

Thanks

#3 User is offline   Jean-Paul 

  • Apprentice
  • Group: First Class
  • Posts: 42
  • Joined: 28-October 14
  • Gender:Male
  • Simulator:Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 18 June 2017 - 10:10 PM

View Poststeamer_ctn, on 18 June 2017 - 03:08 PM, said:

I have run some test stock, and cannot see this problem.

Can you provide a scenario description where it occurs with CTN test stock or MSTS default stock so that I can duplicate (see) the issue that you are describing?

Thanks


Problem exists with Niagara and NYC cinst I sent you yesterday, for cut-offs between 45 and 35 (full regulator), on flat line.
JPaul

#4 User is offline   steamer_ctn 

  • Open Rails Developer
  • Group: Contributing Member
  • Posts: 750
  • Joined: 24-June 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:

Posted 19 June 2017 - 08:56 PM

This issue hopefully should be corrected in #3881

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users