I was quite unhappy for an OR Demo Route that couldn't be used with superelevation, so I have written a track profile for the UKfinescale tracks that are used in such route (and in other routes too).
Here the result:
and here is the track profile: it must be unzipped within a TRACKPROFILES folder that must be created within the SCE folder
TrProfile1.zip (934bytes)
Number of downloads: 387
18/4/2015 NOTE: Replaced zip file with correct one.
It is advised to not select a Superelevation > 5, because else the profile begins going under terrain level in the internal part of the curve.
The development was made possible by the excellent manual written by WaltN and by a sample track profile that oo_Kanawa posted in this forum some time ago.
I found a problem with the tracks of this route, that was already signalled some time ago: here two pictures of the same track section, taken with slightly different angles, on a straight track (so this has nothing to do with the track profile I generated).
So, simply by changing a bit the angle of view, a part or the other of the sleepers (ties) disappears. This is due to the fact that the distance between the plane of the ballast and the one of the ties is very low (1 mm.). However MSTS has no problem in showing this.
I think it is not nice that the route selected as demo route for OR shows such a problem. As there is at least one OR developer that I believe has clear ideas where to intervene, I kindly ask him to try to find a solution, maybe even with a "dirty" patch (e.g. a patch that applies only to track textures, to avoid problems in other cases).