Elvas Tower: TCS Emergency Brake - every 5 seconds ??? - Elvas Tower

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

TCS Emergency Brake - every 5 seconds ??? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   scottb613 

  • Vice President
  • Group: Status: First Class
  • Posts: 2,973
  • Joined: 06-July 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Downeast Maine (soon)
  • Simulator:ORTS
  • Country:

Posted 21 December 2014 - 04:41 PM

Hi Folks,

Fired up some old diesels (NALW FP-40's with the later Texture Upgrade) I haven't used in a while on the Cajon Pass (Marc's Upgraded Ver)... I get a TCS Emergency Brake application every five seconds... I've searched and read some previous posts on the subject here and it sounded like it was resolved... I'm not sure why I am getting it and here is what I have done:

  • I started with a twin loco setup at first - then switched to a single loco.
  • I tried different locations on the route.
  • I tried several of the locomotives in the pack - all with the same result.
  • I tried them in MSTS and they worked fine - no TCS Emergency Brake application.
  • I found and removed the "Vigilance" line from the ENG files.
  • I made sure the "Alerter" function was disabled in ORTS.
  • I tested in "Explore Mode" - then went to "Manual" mode - no change - still trips the brakes.
  • I built an activity and made the locos in question the "Player Consist".


ORTS - nothing works - brakes trip within 5 seconds of opening the throttle... MSTS the same locomotives work fine without issue...

. . . - - - . . .

ENG files attached:
Attached File  Amtrak400.zip (48.18K)
Number of downloads: 284

Regards,
Scott

#2 User is offline   gpz 

  • Superintendant
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 1,772
  • Joined: 27-October 12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Budapest
  • Simulator:OpenRails
  • Country:

Posted 22 December 2014 - 12:13 AM

Without testing the files actually, I see that you have the following entries in the .eng file:
VigilanceMonitor(
		MonitoringDeviceMonitorTimeLimit( -1 )
		MonitoringDeviceAlarmTimeLimit( 5 )
                ...
                ...
                ...
)


The second line sets the time between the last vigilance reset and the beginning of the new audible alert, the first line sets the time between the last reset and the emergency brake application, in seconds. Some more sensible values for these would be 66, 60, respectively. The value of -1 is really weird, the code might not be protected against feeding it with such a physically nonsense value. :bigboss:

#3 User is offline   scottb613 

  • Vice President
  • Group: Status: First Class
  • Posts: 2,973
  • Joined: 06-July 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Downeast Maine (soon)
  • Simulator:ORTS
  • Country:

Posted 22 December 2014 - 04:16 AM

Hi Peter,

Thanks for looking - I kind of thought it was related to "Vigilance" - I had found and removed "Vigilance (0 1 0)" in all the files - I must have missed the additional occurrences - I'm assuming I can just removes these lines as well...

Diesels are not my forte...

Appreciate the help - sir !!!
:bigboss:

Regards,
Scott

#4 User is offline   gpz 

  • Superintendant
  • Group: Status: Elite Member
  • Posts: 1,772
  • Joined: 27-October 12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Budapest
  • Simulator:OpenRails
  • Country:

Posted 22 December 2014 - 05:52 AM

Vigilance (0 1 0) line isn't used by OpenRails at all. :bigboss:

#5 User is offline   markus_GE 

  • Executive Vice President
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: ET Admin
  • Posts: 4,862
  • Joined: 07-February 13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leoben, Styria, Austria, Europe
  • Simulator:ORTS / MSTS
  • Country:

Posted 22 December 2014 - 09:16 AM

Having done loads of research also in that direction for my DPU program, I can say those -1 values are not exactly use over and over, but still occur frequent times. AFAICT they are used as some shortcut to make MSTS think the VigilanceMonitor is switched off.

Cheers, Markus

#6 User is offline   ATW 

  • Engineer
  • Group: Status: Contributing Member
  • Posts: 640
  • Joined: 07-January 13
  • Gender:Male
  • Simulator:MSTS Open Rails
  • Country:

Posted 22 December 2014 - 11:31 AM

With
VigilanceMonitor(
MonitoringDeviceMonitorTimeLimit( 50 )
MonitoringDeviceAlarmTimeLimit( 30 )

I have 20 seconds to respond because the limit is set seconds between the two options.

BTW for some units like the default Acela or other units equipped these have not been implemented either:

DoesBrakeCutPower( 1 )
BrakeCutsPowerAtBrakeCylinderPressure( 15 )

MonitoringDeviceAppliesCutsPower( 1 )
MonitoringDeviceAppliesShutsDownEngine( 1 )

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users