Fictional Railroads Getting creative
#922
Posted 17 January 2019 - 02:17 PM
I've been doing too much thinking and research to actually run anything, so have an old screenshot.
#923
Posted 19 January 2019 - 06:54 PM
#924
Posted 02 February 2019 - 08:22 AM
Also, the new speed lettering version of the CPAC scheme will become more and more prevalent, but only locomotives with safety cabs will wear it. Spartan cab equipped engines will keep their BC Rail style font on the long hood.
#925
Posted 07 February 2019 - 06:24 PM
#926
Posted 08 February 2019 - 07:29 PM
#927
Posted 09 February 2019 - 08:22 AM
#928
Posted 09 February 2019 - 03:05 PM
SD45T-2, on 08 February 2019 - 07:29 PM, said:
I wondered the same thing a few years ago. And by wondered, I meant excessively complained about it in screenshot threads. Yikes.
bwyrick, on 09 February 2019 - 08:22 AM, said:
Oh yeah, can't forget about that NashWash. How else are you going to keep an entire train squeaky clean for those promotional photos? Speaking of which, I always had the idea of a 1950's-style NashWash promotional video.
#929
Posted 09 February 2019 - 09:10 PM
Mipman25, on 09 February 2019 - 03:05 PM, said:
Admittedly, your comments were still valid. Even in real railroad promotional media, the power isn't spotless, which honestly makes clean power even weirder if you think about it. (Except for freshly shopped units.) But I will admit, weathering is a difficult art to make look convincing.
If anyone needs help, please call. I'll try to answer.
Mipman25, on 09 February 2019 - 03:05 PM, said:
If you ever do a NashWash tanker again, may I suggest suggest you put this on it? http://www.elvastower.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/derisive.gif
"Not to be moved via the Des Moines and Mason City Railway." (Yes, I'm planning to weather each DMMC locomotive I make, to various degrees. "Power being washed ain't haulin'.")
And on that note, here's the final-ish version of 2000, with more grime added. The other unit in the GP38-2 pair will come soon.
#930
Posted 09 February 2019 - 11:20 PM
SD45T-2, on 09 February 2019 - 09:10 PM, said:
Even today, I still agree with that. However, those comments kinda stop being valid and just straight-up annoying the thirteen thousandth time around.
SD45T-2, on 09 February 2019 - 09:10 PM, said:
"Not to be moved via the Des Moines and Mason City Railway." (Yes, I'm planning to weather each DMMC locomotive I make, to various degrees. "Power being washed ain't haulin'.")
I remember you wanted F-units on the DMMC? Keep the Nash-Wash for those. As hard-working as a grubby locomotive is, those old covered wagons just wouldn't look right covered in soot. I still want to see a DMMC business train with those F-units.
Oh right, the screenshots! Kinda hard to post new and refreshing content when I haven't touched OR in months. If I actually spent time repainting instead of coming up with crazy and outlandish ideas, then I'd have a boatload of new screenshots to share. A CP&A Heavy Mike lugs a low-priority manifest along the Allegheny Division in western Pennsylvania. This train is headed south to Pittsburgh, and quite a few of the boxcars came from carfloats at Erie.